 |
Goals and
Technical Approach
|
Goals
The work at NIST on
wireless ad hoc networks is
multidisciplinary in that it includes not only the traditional aspects
of networking technology per se but also the many aspects of the theory
and technology of signal processing at the application layer and
statistical communication theory and technology at the physical layer.
In seeking to advance the performance of wireless ad hoc networks,
we seek to use analysis, simulation, and hardware testbeds to
characterize and to assess the performance of new designs and protocols.
In concept, each of these tools provides a reference by which to
measure the network's performance, and each can be used as a means for
validating the other. |
Specifically, we have
pursued the following goals:
- Investigate the performance of routing protocols for MANETs that
have been submitted for possible standardization by the IETF.
- Investigate schemes for implementing user and traffic-type
priority in a wireless ad hoc network.
- Carry out a comparative study of wireless network simulation tools
with an emphasis on scalability of these tools to large networks,
increased traffic loads, increased mobility, etc.
- Develop efficient distributed
detection and estimation algorithms for wireless ad hoc sensor
networks.
- Investigate methods of network self-organization and clustering in
wireless ad hoc sensor networks.
- Develop sensor networks capable of transmitting video information at very low bit rates in a multi-hop, ad-hoc manner.
- Develop kinetic
spanning tree concepts for wireless network routing and
collaboration.
- Develop a Linux kernel AODV
implementation and testbed.
|
Technical
Approach
|
In our work on
performance evaluation of MANET routing protocols, we have used
simulations using the OPNET
and QualNet simulation
software packages. We have developed analytical methods for
predicting the outcomes of particular simulations as a means for
validating the simulations. Our work has resulted in our making
available for downloading OPNET models for the Dynamic Source
Routing (DSR) protocol and the Ad Hoc
On-demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol. In the process of
developing these models, we have improved the OPNET model for the IEEE 802.11b MAC/physical layer
protocol and technology, and this model is included in the download
package. |
Using our DSR OPNET model
as a platform, we investigated methods for giving priority access to
users in an IEEE 802.11b network by making slight changes to the backoff
mechanism for the protocol. We have also studied the statistical
behavior of the backoff algorithm and some alternatives to it that seem
to provide better performance and fairness. |
Our analytical work has
resulted in methods for predicting the distribution
of link distances in a network of randomly deployed radio terminals,
and measures of the probability of n-hop routing paths. These
methods provide intermediate results for assessing network performance
based on the underlying connectivity at a given time.
|
In our work on
distributed detection algorithms, we proposed an extension to the nth
root parley distributed detection algorithm of Swaszek and Willet (P F.
Swaszek and P. Willett, "Parley as an approach to distributed
detection," IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Jan.
1995.). Instead of making a single "hard" decision at each sensor node,
a two bit quantizer is used to choose the hypothesis and also to provide
a confidence measure of this decision. These "soft" decisions are
broadcast to all nodes, and they are used to create a stopping rule that
reduces the number of parleys. For the Bayesian criterion, the
probability of error is unchanged, and it is equal to that of a central
processor; for the Neyman-Pearson criterion, the receiver operating
curve is essentially the same as that of a central processor. The
performance is also compared to that obtained using one-bit decision
makers and the majority fusion rule. Simulation results are
provided for the Gaussian shift in mean problem assuming an ideal
channel and the binary symmetric channel. |
As a first step in
studying self-organization algorithms for wireless sensor networks, we
created a C++ implementation of the Linked Cluster Algorithm (LCA) of
Baker and Ephremides (IEEE Trans. on Communications, Nov. 1981).
Given a set of sensor nodes, the LCA uses a fixed TDMA frame
structure to form clusters so that all the nodes of the cluster are
within one hop of a distinguished node called the cluster head. If
the cluster heads of two adjacent clusters are not within transmission
range of each other, gateway nodes are designated that connect them.
The set of cluster heads and gateways forms the backbone network.
We then proceed to study the interaction of the LCA and the parley
distributed detection algorithm. The primary goal is to determine
the parameters that are responsible for the performance, and then to
draw conclusions about how to optimize them. The reason for this
approach is our contention that one of the primary performance metrics
of a wireless ad hoc sensor network is its ability to detect events of
interest. |
The self-configuration
architecture proposed by Subramanian and Katz (Proc. MobiHoc
2000) leads to a hierarchical network with address
auto-configuration and a number of other useful properties. In
this component of our work on wireless ad hoc sensor networks, we
complete their architecture by proposing a set of distributed algorithms
and message formats that allow an actual implementation.
Specifically, we develop protocols that organize the sensor nodes
into clusters and then merge the clusters to form groups. Groups
merge to form larger groups, in a hierarchical process that dynamically
assigns a unique address to each sensor node. Additionally, a broadcast
tree is constructed in a manner to reduce the maximum number of hops
along the tree. We identify a number of important parameters, and
we study their effects on the overall system
performance. |
To support emergency
responses to natural disasters, surveillance and information gathering
in hostile territories, and robotic search and rescue operations where
existing communication infrastructures are not available, rapid
deployment of an unstructured mobile network, where each unit is capable
of transmitting video information and sensor data, would be essential.
The requirements may include some or all of the following: a
higher upstream bandwidth (for transmitting video data), mobility,
sufficient area coverage, non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communications, and
low energy consumption. |